2 of 17
2
Too young
Posted: 02 May 2012 07:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Gran Pan Pan!!
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  970
Joined  1969-12-31
gunner - 02 May 2012 07:31 PM
Rho - 02 May 2012 06:10 PM
Joe Scarborough on Obama Afghanistan visit: ‘The neocons have won tonight’


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/01/joe-scarborough-on-obama-afghanistan-visit-the-neocons-have-won-tonight/#ixzz1tkyP3u5G


Rho,

Answer these two questions:

So what were all of these lives wasted for?

Where is your outcry of Obama as a War Monger?


Q: So what were all of these lives wasted for?
A: Romney said this in 2007: "It's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person." If you one of those who ascribed to this philosophy, then these lives were wasted for nothing. But, if you are like the rest of us who believe OBL killed Americans and as such we should get him "dead or alive," as Bush, Jr once said, then it's worth it. The above heroes knew what they signed for. As JC implies, in time of wars, it's either kill or be killed. Yes, it's that black and white!!!

Q: Where is your outcry of Obama as a War Monger?
A: When Obama campaigned in 2008, he made the following promise to the American people: As president, my goals would be "to end the war in Iraq and refocus the war in Afghanistan." I voted for him to do just that! And, if I might add, he fulfilled his promise. He did not do bait and switch as republicans such as scott walker of Wisconsin are known to do. Thus, I am asking you: why should there be an outcry when Obama did what he promised?
 Signature 

“Your only sane argument is the need to build infrastructure and empower the Haitian government; stick with that GUNNER.” None other than JC!!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 May 2012 08:49 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Gwo Chèf
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  114
Joined  2010-01-20
Afghanistan was where we should of focus all on after 9/11 but Bush dropped the ball on that one . He went after Saddam and Saddam's fictitious stockpile of WMDs

We cant just leave and pick up our things, and do what we did during the Regan administration where we help the Mujahideen push out the communist and turn our backs.

The Afghan war, had purpose unlike Iraq which was total failure and waste of resources all thanks to Neocons/ Rethugs
[ Edited: 02 May 2012 08:53 PM by Troganwar ]
 Signature 

“Pa gen lape nan tet, si pa gen lape nan vant

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 07:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
Rho - 02 May 2012 07:52 PM
gunner - 02 May 2012 07:31 PM
Rho - 02 May 2012 06:10 PM
Joe Scarborough on Obama Afghanistan visit: ‘The neocons have won tonight’


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/01/joe-scarborough-on-obama-afghanistan-visit-the-neocons-have-won-tonight/#ixzz1tkyP3u5G


Rho,

Answer these two questions:

So what were all of these lives wasted for?

Where is your outcry of Obama as a War Monger?


Q: So what were all of these lives wasted for?
A: Romney said this in 2007: "It's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person." If you one of those who ascribed to this philosophy, then these lives were wasted for nothing. But, if you are like the rest of us who believe OBL killed Americans and as such we should get him "dead or alive," as Bush, Jr once said, then it's worth it. The above heroes knew what they signed for. As JC implies, in time of wars, it's either kill or be killed. Yes, it's that black and white!!!

Q: Where is your outcry of Obama as a War Monger?
A: When Obama campaigned in 2008, he made the following promise to the American people: As president, my goals would be "to end the war in Iraq and refocus the war in Afghanistan." I voted for him to do just that! And, if I might add, he fulfilled his promise. He did not do bait and switch as republicans such as scott walker of Wisconsin are known to do. Thus, I am asking you: why should there be an outcry when Obama did what he promised?


Please, Obama's War had NOTHING to do with OBL's capture.

That was 100% the result of forced interrogations, special forces, and miltary investment.

All things that Obama opposed as senator.

And what has been accomplished in Afghanistan?

I can give a very long list of things accomplished in Iraq but I find NOTHING in Afghanistan.

Taliban? Stronger than ever and poised right on the border for its immediate return.

Security Force? That's a joke. The majority support the Taliban and oppose Obama.

Thousands of dead soldiers at the hands of Obama and for what?

I'll be damned if I can find anybody that can give me solid reasons for Obama's War.

Most (retired) top military offcials will tell you in detail how Obama's plan has FAILED there.

So moving out of Iraq (which Bush had already begun in earnest) and shifting to Afghanistan; for what?

Why did you vote for starting another war in Afghanistan?

Is that REALLY why you voted for him?

Or was it that you have ALWAYS voted for a Democrat?
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 07:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Gran Pan Pan!!
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  970
Joined  1969-12-31
Bon, Gunner, you're a delusional old man! I have nothing else to say!!!
 Signature 

“Your only sane argument is the need to build infrastructure and empower the Haitian government; stick with that GUNNER.” None other than JC!!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 07:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
The result of the present day Pro-War Democrats (who flipped from anti-war) when Obama became president:

war44.jpg
war43.jpg

Something to be proud of!

Pure hypocrisy
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 08:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
sannicolas.jpg
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 08:20 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
Troganwar - 02 May 2012 08:49 PM
Afghanistan was where we should of focus all on after 9/11 but Bush dropped the ball on that one . He went after Saddam and Saddam's fictitious stockpile of WMDs

We cant just leave and pick up our things, and do what we did during the Regan administration where we help the Mujahideen push out the communist and turn our backs.

The Afghan war, had purpose unlike Iraq which was total failure and waste of resources all thanks to Neocons/ Rethugs


What was the purpose?

To capture OBL? Really?

Well our idiot president attacked the WRONG country; shouldn't he of invaded Pakistan?

Military intelligence told him that OBL had escaped into Pakistan in 2007, but he still invaded Afghanistan.

He invades the WRONG country, but, because he's a Democrat, his "war" is noble and good unlike the Re publican's war.

The anti-American, highly corrupt, Karzai, is STILL president, just as he was in 2009 when Obama invaded.

Saddam is long gone and Karzai remains.

Iraq's terrorist groups have been disbanded but they're stronger than ever in Afghanistan and lined up by the thousands for their return from Pakistan.

Obama's War has been an abject FAILURE.

Now, all of the Pro-War (formerly anti-war) Democrat's are circling the waggons to protect this FAILURE and the death of thousands of men and women
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 08:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
Two more young Americans just died YESTERDAY fighting Obama's War.

war45.jpg
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 10:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Gwo Chèf
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  114
Joined  2010-01-20
gunner - 03 May 2012 08:20 AM
Troganwar - 02 May 2012 08:49 PM
Afghanistan was where we should of focus all on after 9/11 but Bush dropped the ball on that one . He went after Saddam and Saddam's fictitious stockpile of WMDs

We cant just leave and pick up our things, and do what we did during the Regan administration where we help the Mujahideen push out the communist and turn our backs.

The Afghan war, had purpose unlike Iraq which was total failure and waste of resources all thanks to Neocons/ Rethugs


What was the purpose?

To capture OBL? Really?

Well our idiot president attacked the WRONG country; shouldn't he of invaded Pakistan?

Military intelligence told him that OBL had escaped into Pakistan in 2007, but he still invaded Afghanistan.

He invades the WRONG country, but, because he's a Democrat, his "war" is noble and good unlike the Re publican's war.

The anti-American, highly corrupt, Karzai, is STILL president, just as he was in 2009 when Obama invaded.

Saddam is long gone and Karzai remains.

Iraq's terrorist groups have been disbanded but they're stronger than ever in Afghanistan and lined up by the thousands for their return from Pakistan.

Obama's War has been an abject FAILURE.

Now, all of the Pro-War (formerly anti-war) Democrat's are circling the waggons to protect this FAILURE and the death of thousands of men and women


So if the military intelligence knew back in 2007 which is information that was passed to Bush and his team where were they on OBL are you admitting to failure of Dubya on national security. Slipped into Pakistan from Tora Bora
[ Edited: 03 May 2012 10:17 AM by Troganwar ]
 Signature 

“Pa gen lape nan tet, si pa gen lape nan vant

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 10:35 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
Troganwar - 03 May 2012 10:08 AM
gunner - 03 May 2012 08:20 AM
Troganwar - 02 May 2012 08:49 PM
Afghanistan was where we should of focus all on after 9/11 but Bush dropped the ball on that one . He went after Saddam and Saddam's fictitious stockpile of WMDs

We cant just leave and pick up our things, and do what we did during the Regan administration where we help the Mujahideen push out the communist and turn our backs.

The Afghan war, had purpose unlike Iraq which was total failure and waste of resources all thanks to Neocons/ Rethugs


What was the purpose?

To capture OBL? Really?

Well our idiot president attacked the WRONG country; shouldn't he of invaded Pakistan?

Military intelligence told him that OBL had escaped into Pakistan in 2007, but he still invaded Afghanistan.

He invades the WRONG country, but, because he's a Democrat, his "war" is noble and good unlike the Re publican's war.

The anti-American, highly corrupt, Karzai, is STILL president, just as he was in 2009 when Obama invaded.

Saddam is long gone and Karzai remains.

Iraq's terrorist groups have been disbanded but they're stronger than ever in Afghanistan and lined up by the thousands for their return from Pakistan.

Obama's War has been an abject FAILURE.

Now, all of the Pro-War (formerly anti-war) Democrat's are circling the waggons to protect this FAILURE and the death of thousands of men and women


So if the military intelligence knew back in 2007 which is information that was passed to Bush and his team where were they on OBL are you admitting to failure of Dubya on national security. Slipped into Pakistan from Tora Bora


National Security failure? Huh?

After 9/11, nothing happened on the terrorist front in the USA, and that was with OBL alive.

So how was OBL a security threat when he made no attempt on the USA after 9/11?

OBL was in Pakistan, Bush and Obama knew it.

So what does Obama do? Invade Afghanistan. I don't get it.

What was the "purpose" of Obama's War?

I see that you're now a Pro-War Democrat as well.

Why did it take almost 2,000 American lives, and over 4,000, total for Obama to kill OBL?

Have terrorists insurgents quit operating since OBL's death?

Look at my casualty list to see that the exact opposite has happened.
Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 12:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Gwo Chèf
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  114
Joined  2010-01-20
gunner - 03 May 2012 10:35 AM
Troganwar - 03 May 2012 10:08 AM
gunner - 03 May 2012 08:20 AM
Troganwar - 02 May 2012 08:49 PM
Afghanistan was where we should of focus all on after 9/11 but Bush dropped the ball on that one . He went after Saddam and Saddam's fictitious stockpile of WMDs

We cant just leave and pick up our things, and do what we did during the Regan administration where we help the Mujahideen push out the communist and turn our backs.

The Afghan war, had purpose unlike Iraq which was total failure and waste of resources all thanks to Neocons/ Rethugs


What was the purpose?

To capture OBL? Really?

Well our idiot president attacked the WRONG country; shouldn't he of invaded Pakistan?

Military intelligence told him that OBL had escaped into Pakistan in 2007, but he still invaded Afghanistan.

He invades the WRONG country, but, because he's a Democrat, his "war" is noble and good unlike the Re publican's war.

The anti-American, highly corrupt, Karzai, is STILL president, just as he was in 2009 when Obama invaded.




Saddam is long gone and Karzai remains.

Iraq's terrorist groups have been disbanded but they're stronger than ever in Afghanistan and lined up by the thousands for their return from Pakistan.

Obama's War has been an abject FAILURE.

Now, all of the Pro-War (formerly anti-war) Democrat's are circling the waggons to protect this FAILURE and the death of thousands of men and women


So if the military intelligence knew back in 2007 which is information that was passed to Bush and his team where were they on OBL are you admitting to failure of Dubya on national security. Slipped into Pakistan from Tora Bora


National Security failure? Huh?

After 9/11, nothing happened on the terrorist front in the USA, and that was with OBL alive.

So how was OBL a security threat when he made no attempt on the USA after 9/11?

OBL was in Pakistan, Bush and Obama knew it.

So what does Obama do? Invade Afghanistan. I don't get it.

What was the "purpose" of Obama's War?

I see that you're now a Pro-War Democrat as well.

Why did it take almost 2,000 American lives, and over 4,000, total for Obama to kill OBL?

Have terrorists insurgents quit operating since OBL's death?

Look at my casualty list to see that the exact opposite has happened.


So if oh glorious Bush/Cheney knew why didn't he kill OBL ?
why shift the attention on to Afghanistan and than Iraq/Saddam if Dubya knew OBL was in Pakistan why not get him
As for the current state of Afghanistan I'm for withdrawing troops out asap
 Signature 

“Pa gen lape nan tet, si pa gen lape nan vant

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2012 02:12 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 24 ]
Sr. Member - Chef de la Patrie
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6218
Joined  2008-07-10
seals.jpg

==================================================

seals1.jpg
Profile
 
 
   
2 of 17
2