Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 2:38pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
ALL HAITIANS GET UP AND MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD WITH OUR WALLETS.THERE ARE ABOUT TWO DOZEN CORPORATIONS WE HATIANS SHOULD BOYCOTT.SOME OF THEM ARE ABUSING OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN HAITI AND SOME THEM HAVE DISCRIMNATORY POLICIES AGAINST HAITIANS HERE IN THE US .SPREAD THE WORD TO EVERYBODY.THESE CLAIMS ARE SUBTANTIANTED ACUSSATIONS NOT ANTI-CORPORATE PROPAGANDA.
1.DISNEY -ABC, WALT-DISNEY, WINNIE THE POOH, DISNEY PICTURES -
WALMART, KMART,TARGET, PUBLIX, KELWOOD, GULF&WESTERN, CITIBANK, CNN, AND MORE WILL COME WITH THEIR WRONGFUL ATTACHED TO EACH POST.
Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 2:40pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
SUPPORT NEWSDAY NEWSPAPERS,WBAI, WLIB, GENERAL ELECTRIC, TOYOTA, HONDA. THESE COMPANIES HAVE HELPED US IN OUR STRUGGLE.
Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 2:45pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
On July 8, National Public Radio (NPR) broadcast a story on Morning Edition by correspondent David Welna in which he argued that it was the misguided efforts of human rights advocates in the United States that were driving Disney and H.H. Cutler to pull out of Haiti. For Welna, the largest multinationals in the world--companies like Disney, Wal-Mart, Kmart, H.H. Cutler/VF--have no other choice but to flee Haiti and move to China in the face of pressure to respect worker rights and to pay a wage that comes close to meeting basic subsistence needs.
Background and Analysis:
David Welna in his report presents only the view that multinationals have the unassailable right to roam the world in search of misery and high unemployment, where "naturally" they will find the lowest wages and the least regulation. Under this scenario, any attempt to condition global trade on respect for human rights, and to hold corporations accountable for the way they treat workers, will boomerang back on the poor, destroying jobs, forcing companies to flee while also deterring further investments.
Despite the fact that it was explained at length to program directors at National Public Radio that this report was unfair and could seriously damage the struggle to defend human and worker rights in Haiti, NPR has refused to give the National Labor Committee (NLC)--or, more importantly, any Haitian popular organizations--the opportunity to respond.
Office on Haiti and to the workers' center in Haiti, Batay Ouvriye.
To set the record straight: it was the Haitian workers who requested that the National labor Committee convey to Disney and its contractors their modest wage proposal (58 cents an hour, up from 28 cents an hour) and their need to have their rights respected.
The question of jobs in Haiti is a deadly serious one, never to be taken lightly. There is massive unemployment. The NLC spoke with Haitian workers, with Batay Ouvriye and other Haitian organizations about the possible threat that Disney and other contractors could react to a solidarity campaign by cutting and fleeing from Haiti. NLC pledged that it, and the organizations it worked with, would fight with every ounce of strength that they have to prevent that.
The National Labor Committee first became involved in Haiti in 1993 at the request of President Bertrand Aristide, who asked the NLC to travel to Haiti (during the coup) to investigate serious human rights abuses in the assembly factories producing under contract with U.S. companies. In fact, one reason for the coup was to block President Aristide's wage reforms. The National Labor Committee was the only labor rights organization invited to return to Haiti with President Aristide, who wrote to the Committee:
"Your dedication to Haiti and your tireless support for our cause have given Haiti a chance to make democracy bloom again. On behalf of the Haitian people, and myself, I offer our profound gratitude for the hand of solidarity that you extended."
The NLC points out that, in the past, it has worked successfully with other giant U.S. apparel companies, such as Liz Claiborne and The Gap, generating popular pressure so that they kept their production in Central America, rather than cutting and running in the fact of human rights campaigns.
Suggested Action:
It is important that such a biased report as the one by David Welna not go unchallenged, since it could have serious consequences, in effect, leading people to hesitate, to question the value of human rights campaigns, afraid their efforts will backfire and hurt the very people they wanted to aid. Such an agenda frees the hands of the multi-nationals while tying the hands of decent people.
Write, fax, or e-mail a letter to National Public Radio demanding equal time for Haitian human rights groups.
Sample letter:
Mr. Greg Allen Senior Editor, Morning Edition National Public Radio 635 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-3753 Fax: (202) 414-3329
The NPR story by David Welna, broadcast on July 8, regarding the need of Disney and other multinationals to flee Haiti in the face of a human rights campaign was factually incorrect and biased. It has caused considerable harm. I urge NPR to provide equal time to Batay Ouvriye, a worker rights group in Haiti, and to an important Haitian human rights organization in the U.S., the Washington Office on Haiti. These representatives of the Haitian people deserve the chance to respond to the misinformation in the report and the opportunity to try to undo some of the damage done to the defense of human and worker rights in Haiti.
Sincerely,
Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 2:49pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
You Should Boycott Disney by Jenni "Emiko" Kuida
When I was growing up, I loved going to Disneyland. My favorite ride was the "It’s a Small World" ride. I loved riding in the boat and watching the cute little dolls of diverse cultures dancing around and singing happily.
Last week, delegates at the 15-million member Southern Baptist convention voted to boycott Disney for its supposed promotion of gay and lesbian lifestyles. Apparently, the Southern Baptists believe that Disney is "gay-friendly" and immoral because they offer health insurance benefits for same-sex partners. Baptists say that the last straw was when Disney owned ABC-sitcom funny lady, Ellen Degeneres, came out as a lesbian last month.
Their plan is to boycott KABC-TV, Disney cartoons, movies and theme parks. I’m really bothered by this. Disney should be congratulated for refusing to discriminate against gays and lesbians on the health benefits issue. More businesses should follow the example set by Disney. I hope that Disney officials don’t cave in to the religious right-wing groups and change their benefits policies.
I think that the Southern Baptists are right in boycotting Disney. But they are doing it for all THE WRONG REASONS.
If they want to boycott Disney, it should be for Disney’s blatant exploitation of women and children who work under sweatshop conditions throughout the world. Disney contracts with factories in Indonesia, Thailand, China, Honduras, El Salvador, and Haiti. Independent monitoring groups sponsored by unions and religious groups (with the exception of the Southern Baptists) have reported abuse and terrible working conditions in Disney sweatshops.
Michael Eisner, CEO of the Disney conglomerate, earned the equivalent of $189 million in 1996, or approximately $100,000 per hour, according to Charles Kernaghan of the National Labor Committee (NLC). That’s about half a million dollars before lunch.
In comparison, workers in Haiti making Disney-licensed products, earn approximately 28 to 30 cents an hour. That’s $1.50 before lunch. For every $11.97 pair of Pocohantas pajamas sold, a Haitian worker earns only 7 cents.
The NLC has reported that more than half of the 50 firms operating in Haiti are violating the country’s minimum wage laws. Workers, mostly teenage women work 12-16 hour days making Disney products in dusty, sweltering factories. Women who are pregnant are forced to quit so employers can avoid paying maternity benefits. If workers speak out against their conditions, they are fired.
Like many companies, Disney has responded to the complaints with excuses that they are not an employer in Haiti. "When we license our images to third parties in the U.S. and around the world, we require that they follow all applicable employment and environmental laws. Violation of any law is grounds for immediate termination of the contract," according to a statement by Disney.
The NLC has launched a campaign to get a living wage for Haitians making Disney products and raising their wages to 58 cents an hour. A small percentage of Disney shareholders have also shown moral leadership. Recently, 8.5% of Disney shareholders voted to improve their pay and working conditions and to hire an independent group to monitor overseas factories for labor abuses. It’s a small world and these are some small steps in the right direction.
As an Asian American woman, I believe we should support the Disney boycott. NOT because they have "gay-friendly" policies. But because my Issei grandmothers worked as seamstresses in Los Angeles factories for decades. Because of Thai garment workers toiling in sweatshops in El Monte. Because thousands of women of color continue to work under deplorable sweatshop conditions in Los Angeles, Asia, Central America and Haiti. Because as cute as Mickey Mouse is, he and the Walt Disney Co. should be held accountable for their corporate responsibilities.
If you are going to boycott Disney, do it for the right reasons. Because it’s a small world after all.
NLC has produced a short documentary Mickey Mouse Goes to Haiti. For a copy or more info, contact: Disney Campaign, National Labor Committee, 275 7th Avenue, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10001 or call (212) 242-0986.
Holdings of the Walt Disney Company:
Theme Parks: Disneyland and Disney World in Florida Retail: The Disney Store (over 500 stores) Movie studios: Selected films by Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Caravan Pictures and Miramax Broadcast: ABC-TV and radio networks Cable: Tne DIsney Channel and partial ownership of ESPN, A&E and Lifetime Sports: Owner of Mighty Ducks hockey team, General Partner of Anaheim Angels Music: Hollywood Records and Walt Disney Records Print: Oakland Press, Albany Democrat-Hearld and the Daily Tidings of Ashland Magazines: Discover and Los Angeles Plays: "Beauty and the Beast" on Broadway and "The Lion King" set to open this Fall Other Ventures: Disney Cruise Line, Disney Vacation Clubs, Club
Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 2:53pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
Though the demand by Haiti for reparations from France is just, it obscures the role the United States played in the process to impoverish Haiti - a role that continues to this day.
Today Haiti is a severely indebted country whose debt to export ratio is nearly 300 percent, far above what is considered sustainable even by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Both institutions are dominated by the U.S.
In 1980 Haiti’s debt was $302 million. Since then it has more than tripled to $1.1 billion, approximately 40 percent of the nation’s gross national product. Last year Haiti paid more in debt service than it did on medical services for the people.
Haitian officials say nearly 80 percent of the current debt was accumulated by the regimes of Francois and Jean-Claude Duvalier, Doc and Baby Doc. Both regimes operated under the benign gaze of the United States that has had a long and sordid history of keeping Haiti well within its sphere of economic and political influence.
It is now well known that the primary source of Haiti’s chronic impoverishment is the reparations it was forced to pay to the former plantation owners who left following the 1804 revolution. Some of the white descendants of the former plantation owners, who now live in New Orleans, still have the indemnity coupons issued by France. So in fact, at least part of the reparations paid by Haiti went toward the development of the United States.
In 1825 Haiti was forced to borrow 24 million francs from private French banks to begin paying off the crippling indemnity debt. Haiti only acknowledged this debt in exchange for French recognition of her independence, a principle that would continue to characterize Haiti’s international relationships.
These indemnity payments caused continual financial emergencies and political upheavals. In a 51-year period, Haiti had 16 different presidents - new presidents often coming to power at the head of a rebel army.
Nevertheless, Haiti always made the indemnity payments - and, following those, the bank loan payments - on time. The 1915 intervention by the Marines on behalf of U.S. financial interests changed all of that, however.
The prelude to the 1915 U.S. intervention began in 1910 when the National Bank of Haiti, founded in 1881 with French capital and entrusted from the start with the administration of the Haitian treasury, disappeared. It was replaced by the financial institution known as the National Bank of the Republic of Haiti.
Part of the capital of the new national bank was subscribed by the National City Bank of New York, signaling, for the first time, U.S. interest in the financial affairs of Haiti.
The motivation for the original U.S. financial interest in Haiti was the schemes of several U.S. corporations with ties to the National City Bank to build a railroad system there. In order for these corporations - including the W.R. Grace Corp. - to protect their investments, they pressured President Woodrow Wilson and his secretary of state, William Jennings Bryan, to find ways to stabilize the Haitian economy, namely by taking a controlling interest in the Haitian custom houses, the main source of revenue for the government.
After Secretary of State Bryan was fully briefed on Haiti by his advisers, he exclaimed, “Dear me, think of it! Niggers speaking French.”
Ironically, however, Bryan, a longtime anti-imperialist, was against any exploitative relationship between the U.S. and Haiti or any other nation in the Western Hemisphere. In fact he had long called for canceling the debts of smaller nations as a means by which they could normally grow and develop. Not surprisingly, Bryan’s views were not well received in Washington or on Wall Street.
Due to the near total ignorance at the State Department and in Washington generally about Haiti, Bryan was forced to rely on anyone who had first hand information. That person turned out to be Roger L. Farnham, one of the few people thoroughly familiar with Haitian affairs.
Farnham was thoroughly familiar with Haitian affairs because he was vice-president of the National City Bank of New York and of the new National Bank of the Republic of Haiti and president of the National Railway of Haiti. In spite of the secretary of state’s hostility to Wall Street and Farnham’s obvious conflict of interest, Bryan leaned heavily on Farnham for information and advice.
As vice president of both National City Bank and the National Bank of the Republic of Haiti, Farnham played a cat and mouse game with the Haitian legislature and president. Alternately, he would threaten direct U.S. intervention or to withhold government funds if they did not turn over control of the Haitian custom houses to National City Bank. In defense of Haitian independence, lawmakers refused at every juncture.
Finally, in 1914, with the outbreak of World War I, Farnham was able to convince Washington that France and Germany posed direct threats to the U.S. by their presence in Haiti. Each had a small colony of business people there.
In December of 1914, Farnham arranged for the U.S. Marines to come ashore at Port Au Prince, march into the new National Bank of Haiti and steal two strongboxes containing $500,000 in Haitian currency and sail to New York, where the money was placed in New York City Bank. This made the Haitian government totally dependent on Farnham for finances with which to operate.
The final and immediate decision to intervene in Haiti came in July of 1915 with yet another overthrow of a Haitian president, this time the bloody demise of Vilbrun Guillaume Sam.
For the next 19 years, the U.S. Marine Corps wielded supreme authority throughout Haiti, often dispensing medicines and food as mild forms of pacification. Within several years, however, charges of massacres of Haitian peasants were made against the military as Haitians revolted against the road building programs that required forced labor.
In one such incident at Fort Reviere, the Marines killed 51 Haitians without sustaining any casualties themselves. Assistant Secretary of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt awarded Major Smedley D. Butler the Congressional Medal of Honor. That’s not unlike the awarding of Medals of Honor to the “heroes” of the massacre at Wounded Knee, in which hundreds of Sioux Native Americans were slaughtered in 1890.
Reports of U.S. military abuses against the Haitians became so widespread that NAACP official James Weldon Johnson headed a delegation to investigate the charges, which they deemed to be true.
While the U.S. occupation was not without some successes - the health care system was improved and the currency was stabilized - it was in other economic spheres where the most damage was done. For the entire 19-year duration of the intervention, maximum attention was given to paying off Haiti’s U.S. creditors, with little to no attention given to developing the economy.
In 1922 former Marine Brigade Commander John Russell was named as High Commissioner of Haiti, a post he held until the final days of the occupation. Under Russell’s influence, all political dissent was stifled and revenue from the custom houses was turned over, often months ahead of schedule, to Haiti’s U.S. bond creditors, who had assumed loans originally extended to Haiti to pay off the French plantation owners’ reparations!
By 1929, however, with the Western world’s economic depression and the lowering of living standards throughout Haiti, serious student strikes and worker revolts, combined with Wall Street’s inability to lure serious business investors there, Washington decided it was time to end the military occupation. When then President Franklin D. Roosevelt visited Haiti in 1934 to announce the pullout, he was the first head of a foreign nation in Haiti’s history to extend a visit.
Despite the American military pullout, U.S. financial administrators continued to dominate the Haitian economy until the final debt on the earlier loans was retired in 1947.
Soon after the U.S. withdrew from Haiti, a Black consciousness movement of sorts took hold that was the precursor of the “negritude” movement popularized by Aimee Cesaire and Leopold Senghor. Francois Duvalier, an early believer in “negritude,” came to power in the late 1950s, popularizing ideas that resonated with a population that had withstood a white foreign occupation for many years.
By the time Duvalier grabbed the presidency of the world’s first Black republic established by formerly enslaved peoples, Haiti had experienced more than 150 years of chronic impoverishment and discriminatory lending policies by the world’s leading financial institutions and powers. The economic forecast for Haiti has not improved, even with the democratic election of Jean Bertrand Aristide, since he has been consistently demonized in the U.S. and world press.
It is now time to do the obvious. Accede to Haiti’s demands for reparations and cancel her debt.
Message posted by Guest on November-04-2003 at 3:07pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
LET' ASLO BOYCOTT THE BAHAMAS FOR ITS DISCRIMINATOTY RULES AGAINST HAITIANS, DOMINICAN PRODUCTS SELL IN THE US SHOULD BE BOYCOTT, CHECK YOUR DOMINO SUGAR, YOUR BLOUSES, DON'T WATCH BASEBALL, YOUR RICE AT THE SUPERMARKET, DON'T BUY IN DOMINICAN BODEGAS, GIVE THE MONEY TO THE ARAB MAN, AT LEAST THEY WON'T BOMBES US , WE GOT NO QUARELL WITH THEM ,LET THE US DEAL WITH THEM BECAUSE WE HAITIANS DON'T LIKE TERRORISTS ALSO.THERE TOO MANY IN HAITI ALREADY. BOYCOTT TRAVEL MAGAZINES WHO ARE DEDICATED WHO DON'T DO FEATURES ON HAITI LIKE CONDE NAST TRAVELER, CARIBBEAN MAGAZINE, MCI, THEY TOOK SOME 300 MILLIONS DOLLARS TO BUILD A NATIONAL WIRELESS NETWORK IN HAITI BUT GO THERE AND SEE THE RESULTS AND NEXT WE ARE TO BOYCOTT FRENCH PRODUTCS LIKE THE AMERICANS IF THEY DON'T DECIDE ON A TIMETABLE TO RETURN AND RESTITUTE THE MONEY.
Message posted by Guest on November-05-2003 at 1:28am - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
I LOVE HAITIAN PEOPLE SO MUCH..LOVE THE CULTURE..I TAKE OFF MY HAT TO ALL HAITIAN...TO THE POOR THE ELITE THE MIDDLE CLASS..I LOVE YOU ALL..IF HAITIANS WOULD UNITE....WE WOULD BE A DEVELOPING NATIAN, NOT A POOR COUNTRY...IT IS OUR DEVISION THAT IS PULLING US DOWN....OUR HISTORY IS SUPER RICH AND YET WE ARE POOR..WE HAVE TO KNOW WHO WE ARE AND OUR HISTORY TO MOVE FOWARD...THINK ABOUT ALL HAITIAN HAVE A LOT TO BE PROUD ABOUT...HOLD YOUR HEADS UP HIGH AND LET THE BLOOD OF YOUR FORFATHERS RUN THROUGH YOUR VAINS....L'UNION FAIT LA FORCE....
Message posted by Guest on November-05-2003 at 9:33pm - IP Logged
Guest
Standard Member
October-03-2002
3133 Posts
This is great stuff, very informative this is indeed Haitixchange is suppose to be, the Temple of knowledge. Thank you for the valuable information. We need to share them with our people in plain Creole so that they can understand where their misery came from. Beside the French who suppose to return our wealth stolen from us at gun point sort of speak some US institutions need to pay their debt toward Haiti. My most important questions are; can we have these stories out in main street press. can we find money to have them published, who can help? Please come forward. Again good job let the truth out friends!
Daniel Ulysse
Message posted by kreyolbro on November-05-2003 at 10:09pm - IP Logged
kreyolbro
Standard Member
United States
November-11-2002
464 Posts
Daniel; these articles are from the mainstream press, they have been published. One or two of the Guest posters simply failed to credit the authors.